mirror of
https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App.git
synced 2026-04-26 21:05:55 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #647] ARM64 Windows Support #342
Labels
No labels
android 🤖
assigned to core 🦹
bug 🐛
documentation 📚
documentation 📚
duplicate 🚫
external issue 🔼
external issue 🔼
feature request 🌟
funded on issuehunt 💵
help wanted 🆘
improvement request 🔨
improvement request 🔨
ios 🍎
mobile 📱
needs investigation 🔬
needs more info ℹ️
needs specs 📐
plugin idea 🔌
plugin idea 🔌
poll 🗳️
pull-request
question ❓
rewarded on issuehunt 🎁
security issue 🔑
won’t fix ❌
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/BoostNote-App#342
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @justrach on GitHub (Oct 15, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App/issues/647
Originally assigned to: @Rokt33r on GitHub.
Current behavior
Emulated in 32 bit windows emulator
Expected behavior
A native build would be great since Electron recently added 64 bit support for ARM64 :)
Load in ARM64, however, it loads in the emulation layer, leading to a lack of battery loss.
Steps to reproduce
Are the binaries open to compile it for ARM64, so that there can be unofficial releases.
Environment
ARM64 for Windows10
Desktop/Web
IssueHunt Summary
Backers (Total: $20.00)
Become a backer now!
Or submit a pull request to get the deposits!
Tips
@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2021):
I don't have an arm64 windows pc. But I'm sure that adding
arm64toarchshould work. Do you think you can test the building?arm64to here https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote.next/blob/master/package.json#L250-L253.envfile and setBOOST_HUB_BASE_URL=https://boostnote.io.Then you will get an executable so you can run it in your pc.
@justrach commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2021):
Hi, yes it works
-> Tested on M1 Mac w the M1 Chip.. Is there a way to fix that?

However, there are signing issues, but I believe that is due to the unofficial port that we would be building is that right?
@Rokt33r commented on GitHub (Aug 31, 2021):
@justrach Thanks for testing then we should provide build for arm64 too.
https://github.com/electron-userland/electron-builder/pull/5426 seems electron builder is supporting the apple silicon chip so I think we can try the same trick on M1 Mac.
@issuehunt-oss[bot] commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2021):
@boostio has funded $20.00 to this issue.