starred/ArchiveBox

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #1619] Feature Request: Integration of ReplayWeb.Page for previewing WARC/WACZ files #971

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-01 14:47:38 +03:00 by kerem · 1 comment

kerem commented

2026-03-01 14:47:38 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @nopper on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1619

Originally assigned to: @pirate on GitHub.

What type of suggestion are you making?

New extractor / type of content to save

What is the problem that your feature request solves?

It would be great if ArchiveBox provided a simple HTML page for viewing the warc/wacz files that are being generated.

What is your proposed solution?

One suggestion would be to incorporate replayweb.page as a potential web component for rendering these files. This would be particularly useful for sites that are not adequately captured by single-file formats due to the presence of dynamic elements or scripts.

What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem?

Share the entire output of the `archivebox version` command for the current verison you are using.

latest

How badly do you want this new feature?

It's an urgent deal-breaker, I can't live without it
It's important to add it in the near-mid term future
It would be nice to have eventually
I'm willing to work on a PR to develop this myself
I have donated money to go towards fixing this issue

Mini Survey

I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend
I've had a lot of difficulty getting ArchiveBox set up
I would pay $10/mo for a hosted version of ArchiveBox if it had this feature

Originally created by @nopper on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1619 Originally assigned to: @pirate on GitHub. ### What type of suggestion are you making? New extractor / type of content to save ### What is the problem that your feature request solves? It would be great if ArchiveBox provided a simple HTML page for viewing the warc/wacz files that are being generated. ### What is your proposed solution? One suggestion would be to incorporate [replayweb.page](https://github.com/webrecorder/replayweb.page?tab=readme-ov-file) as a potential web component for rendering these files. This would be particularly useful for sites that are not adequately captured by single-file formats due to the presence of dynamic elements or scripts. ### What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem? - ### Share the entire output of the `archivebox version` command for the current verison you are using. ```shell latest ``` ### How badly do you want this new feature? - [ ] It's an urgent deal-breaker, I can't live without it - [x] It's important to add it in the near-mid term future - [x] It would be nice to have eventually - [ ] I'm willing to [work on a PR](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox#archivebox-development) to develop this myself - [ ] I have [donated money](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Donations) to go towards fixing this issue ### Mini Survey - [ ] I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend - [ ] I've had a lot of difficulty getting ArchiveBox set up - [ ] I would pay $10/mo for a hosted version of ArchiveBox if it had this feature

kerem commented

2026-03-01 14:47:39 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pirate commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024):

Already have this on my roadmap 😁

have even implemented it a couple times: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/pull/1327/files#diff-08041ea7039132ec35c8a6d986cb5f3808decf38291f48f199a8d76af3d1cba5

the blocker is the warcs produced by plain wget are not standards compliant and look terrible, so we need to switch to wget-lua or browsertrix to actually capture them, and that's a much bigger ordeal

@pirate commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024): Already have this on my roadmap 😁 have even implemented it a couple times: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/pull/1327/files#diff-08041ea7039132ec35c8a6d986cb5f3808decf38291f48f199a8d76af3d1cba5 the blocker is the warcs produced by plain wget are not standards compliant and look terrible, so we need to switch to wget-lua or browsertrix to actually capture them, and that's a much bigger ordeal

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-01 17:56:34 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #971] Bug: Parsing Wallabag RSS feed fails #2112

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 23:46:18 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #971] Bug: Parsing Wallabag RSS feed fails #3623

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/ArchiveBox#971

No description provided.

Rows
Columns