starred/ArchiveBox

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git synced 2026-04-26 01:26:00 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #1460] Feature Request: Update Django dependency #869

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-01 14:46:57 +03:00 by kerem · 2 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-01 14:46:57 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @brighamcampbell on GitHub (Jul 8, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1460

Type

General question or discussion
Propose a brand new feature
Request modification of existing behavior or design

What is the problem that your feature request solves

Django 3.1 no longer works with the latest version of Python 3.12 because it uses distutils, which Python 3.12 removed. Django 3.1 hasn't been supported for over three years now. It's time to update the dependency.

It's unclear to me why ArchiveBox uses Django < 3.2 specifically and how much effort it would require to update, but I'm willing to contribute.

How badly do you want this new feature?

Personally, I'm fine using pyenv to run ArchiveBox using Python 3.11, but this will very quickly become an issue for many users of ArchiveBox.

I'm willing to contribute dev time to fix this issue
I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend

Originally created by @brighamcampbell on GitHub (Jul 8, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1460 ## Type - [ ] General question or discussion - [ ] Propose a brand new feature - [x] Request modification of existing behavior or design ## What is the problem that your feature request solves Django 3.1 no longer works with the latest version of Python 3.12 because it uses `distutils`, which Python 3.12 removed. Django 3.1 hasn't been supported for over three years now. It's time to update the dependency. It's unclear to me why ArchiveBox uses Django < 3.2 specifically and how much effort it would require to update, but I'm willing to contribute. ## How badly do you want this new feature? Personally, I'm fine using pyenv to run ArchiveBox using Python 3.11, but this will very quickly become an issue for many users of ArchiveBox. --- - [x] I'm willing to contribute [dev time](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox#archivebox-development) to fix this issue - [x] I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend

kerem closed this issue

2026-03-01 14:46:57 +03:00

kerem commented

2026-03-01 14:46:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pirate commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2024):

This is already done, dev is on 5.0.

@pirate commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2024): This is already done, `dev` is on 5.0.

kerem commented

2026-03-01 14:46:57 +03:00

Author

Owner

@brighamcampbell commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2024):

This is already done, dev is on 5.0.

Shoot. I don't know why I didn't think to check... 😅

@brighamcampbell commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2024): > This is already done, `dev` is on 5.0. Shoot. I don't know why I didn't think to check... :sweat_smile:

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-01 17:56:02 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #869] The Demo is down #2047

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-14 23:28:22 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #869] The Demo is down #3557

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/ArchiveBox#869

No description provided.

Rows
Columns