mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1381] Ability to disable archiving if not logged in #842
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#842
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @sdb2754 on GitHub (Mar 14, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1381
Type
What is the problem that your feature request solves
Describe the ideal specific solution you'd want, and whether it fits into any broader scope of changes
Admin page option: Disable/enable guests from making a snapshot
What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem?
I haven't found any. I thought about trying to modify the code, but it seems risky, as I'm not an expert.
How badly do you want this new feature?
I think this is a security risk.
I like this tool, and its very impressive. I'm not sure that I have the skill to help with this feature, but I think its very important.
@pirate commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2024):
@sdb2754 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024):
Thank you. I apologize. I looked around for this, but must have not had the right search terms.
@pirate commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024):
All good 👍
SNAPSHOT_MAX_TOTAL_SIZEoption to cap total snapshot size at some limit #2030SNAPSHOT_MAX_TOTAL_SIZEoption to cap total snapshot size at some limit #3542