mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #713] Feature Request: allow sorting Snapshot list by files column to order archived pages before/after unarchived ones #448
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#448
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @dominictarr on GitHub (Apr 19, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/713
Type
What is the problem that your feature request solves
To use archivebox as a means to save websites for viewing offline, it's hard to find the content that is actually usable.
The main view shows a list of every URL known, but most of these are not loadable. I had to click next page 13 times to get to some that were. I need a way to at least see a short list of content I can actually view.
Describe the ideal specific solution you'd want, and whether it fits into any broader scope of changes
option to sort links view by local availability
What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem?
manually searching... but it isn't worth it
How badly do you want this new feature?
@pirate commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2021):
Why are they not visible? Most of the content should be usable, if more than 10% of your sites are failing to archive then there are bigger problems that a sort column alone won't fix.
@dominictarr commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2021):
I stopped it because it had downloaded more of a site than I needed (but still not some parts that I actually wanted...) I was just trying to figure out how it was working and wether it could actually be useful to me