[GH-ISSUE #1601] Website hosted on CDN | status not 200 #3971

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-15 01:09:29 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-15 01:09:29 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @LeonemZhang on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1601

Originally assigned to: @pirate on GitHub.

What type of suggestion are you making?

Modification of existing behavior

What is the problem that your feature request solves?

Some websites are hosted on CDN. Attempting to obtain the page PDF may result in unexpected outcomes.
Sometimes when accessing these URLs, the HTTP status is not even 200.
The archiving results of these websites have been determined as successful, so they can be successfully obtained when using success status filtering

What is your proposed solution?

If the website's access result is not 200, the archive result should also be a failure

What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem?

non

What version of ArchiveBox are you currently using?

0.8.5rc51

How badly do you want this new feature?

It's an urgent deal-breaker, I can't live without it
It's important to add it in the near-mid term future
It would be nice to have eventually
I'm willing to work on a PR to develop this myself
I have donated money to go towards fixing this issue

Mini Survey

I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend
I've had a lot of difficulty getting ArchiveBox set up
I would pay $10/mo for a hosted version of ArchiveBox if it had this feature

Originally created by @LeonemZhang on GitHub (Nov 22, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1601 Originally assigned to: @pirate on GitHub. ### What type of suggestion are you making? Modification of existing behavior ### What is the problem that your feature request solves? Some websites are hosted on CDN. Attempting to obtain the page PDF may result in unexpected outcomes. Sometimes when accessing these URLs, the HTTP status is not even 200. The archiving results of these websites have been determined as successful, so they can be successfully obtained when using success status filtering [](https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA980-1.html) ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dcedcdc-6848-466b-bd13-a6cd0abcbfce) ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d4127a6d-7ace-47db-b798-461e0e6b6708) ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5fd2e0a-b664-44df-8e4e-3b52513ca53d) ### What is your proposed solution? If the website's access result is not 200, the archive result should also be a failure ### What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem? non ### What version of ArchiveBox are you currently using? ```shell 0.8.5rc51 ``` ### How badly do you want this new feature? - [ ] It's an urgent deal-breaker, I can't live without it - [ ] It's important to add it in the near-mid term future - [x] It would be nice to have eventually - [ ] I'm willing to [work on a PR](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox#archivebox-development) to develop this myself - [ ] I have [donated money](https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Donations) to go towards fixing this issue ### Mini Survey - [x] I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend - [ ] I've had a lot of difficulty getting ArchiveBox set up - [ ] I would pay $10/mo for a hosted version of ArchiveBox if it had this feature

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/ArchiveBox#3971

No description provided.

Rows
Columns