mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #788] Use whitenoise for serving static files instead of django.views.static.serve #3520
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#3520
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @pirate on GitHub (Jul 14, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/788
https://github.com/evansd/whitenoise
Also has the added benefit of supporting Byte-Range requests (so video files will be seekable), brotli/gzip compression, and other nice headers
@pirate commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2024):
I tried this and it doesn't actually help us with anything, since we need byte-range requests for user-created archive content, not the staticfiles.
Removed it in favor of configuring uwsgi to support honor byte-range requests instead.