mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #714] Feature Request: URL Tree View #3469
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#3469
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @dominictarr on GitHub (Apr 19, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/714
Type
What is the problem that your feature request solves
Main view shows a list of all URLs known, which is likely pages from a single site.
for to use archivebox to get content for offline viewing, it would be better to have the top level show the sites have been indexed, and then click to see the urls inside of that. So that I can start browsing by looking at the sites available, instead of choosing from every URL
Describe the ideal specific solution you'd want, and whether it fits into any broader scope of changes
Tree like view of URLs downloaded
What hacks or alternative solutions have you tried to solve the problem?
Just clicking next... but it's not a workable solution
How badly do you want this new feature?
@pirate commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2021):
Probably not going to build this, archivebox's main use case is not archiving a single domain, you're better off using something like Sitesucker for that.
@dominictarr commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2021):
sitesucker appears to be osx only...
can you recommend anything that works on linux or windows? btw, in practice I'd want less than a single domain.
For example, wikipedia or wikitravel, but just topics I'm interested in or that are useful, getting everything would take too long.
@pirate commented on GitHub (May 7, 2021):
Check out some of these: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community#other-archivebox-alternatives