[PR #1457] Implement searching individual fields #2942

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-01 18:01:12 +03:00 by kerem · 0 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-01 18:01:12 +03:00

Owner

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/pull/1457

State: closed
Merged: Yes

Summary

This adds a rudimentary implementation of #1453.
So far, this only changes the search box on the public view, as the custom form and corresponding logic there were relatively simple to track down and change.
As far as I can tell, the one on the admin page uses Django's built-in functionality instead, and I didn't see any immediate way to change that logic.

The current list of supported fields is mostly just based on the placeholder in the search input, but adding more metadata fields should be trivial.
Another interesting change could be to have the Metadata option run ripgrep, but restricted to index.json via glob (or the equivalent for other backends), but that would require a change in the search backends' search() function signature.

#1453

Changes these areas

Bugfixes
Feature behavior
Command line interface
Configuration options
Internal architecture
Snapshot data layout on disk

**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/pull/1457 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes ---  # Summary This adds a rudimentary implementation of #1453. So far, this only changes the search box on the public view, as the custom form and corresponding logic there were relatively simple to track down and change. As far as I can tell, the one on the admin page uses Django's built-in functionality instead, and I didn't see any immediate way to change that logic. The current list of supported fields is mostly just based on the placeholder in the search input, but adding more metadata fields should be trivial. Another interesting change could be to have the `Metadata` option run ripgrep, but restricted to `index.json` via glob (or the equivalent for other backends), but that would require a change in the search backends' `search()` function signature. # Related issues #1453 # Changes these areas - [ ] Bugfixes - [x] Feature behavior - [ ] Command line interface - [ ] Configuration options - [ ] Internal architecture - [ ] Snapshot data layout on disk

kerem

2026-03-01 18:01:12 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
pull-request
label

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/ArchiveBox#2942

No description provided.

Rows
Columns