mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #355] Bugfix: archivebox django branch look #254
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#254
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @walkero-gr on GitHub (Jul 7, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/355
Describe the bug
I know that the django branch is a WIP but I would like to be sure there is not a problem on my side, about the look of it. Should it look better than what you see on the screenshot below? If yes, then I can try to find why on my side looks like that. If not, I might be able to help on making it look better with some contribution on my side, if you like.
Screenshots or log output
Software versions
1866da3@pirate commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2020):
Try with
archivebox serverinstead of opening the index file directly.@cdvv7788 commented on GitHub (Jul 9, 2020):
I think this PR should have fixed it: https://github.com/pirate/ArchiveBox/pull/360
Can you please confirm @walkero-gr ?