mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 09:06:02 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #1291] Feature Request: New extractor to download javascript/ts sourcemap files for any compiled/minified .js assets used in archived pages #2305
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#2305
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @jensolsson on GitHub (Dec 17, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/1291
I love how ArchiveBox is downloading javascript files from a specific site, however to make minified javascript readable it would be great to also include the .map file (called javascript source maps. If I understand correctly they are the same name but ends in .js.map instead of .js). Can this be added easily ?
If someone would give me some pointers on where to start I could probably do the work
@pirate commented on GitHub (Dec 17, 2023):
This would likely require a new extractor, since none of our existing extractors try to download or are even aware of
.mapfiles.You can check out our docs on that process here: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox#contributing-a-new-extractor
Though to be honest this one would be fairly low on my priority list as it's just for developer experience and doesn't visually impact replay fidelity.
If you're interested in contributing an extractor, we'd love to have help adding one of these higher-impact ones, and I'm offering $250~$1000+ bounties for contributions at the moment:
gallery-dl@Myestery commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024):
Hello @pirate, if this bounty is still up I'll like to work on it
@pirate commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024):
The bounty is unfortunatley no longer available, but once the plugin ecosystem is released in v0.9.0 https://docs.sweeting.me/s/archivebox-plugin-ecosystem-announcement it should be much easier to contribute new extractors, please check back in a bit!