mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:26:00 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #457] Feature Request: Allowing the import of already archived URLs. #1811
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#1811
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @dbeley on GitHub (Aug 23, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/457
Type
What is the problem that your feature request solves
Hi, thanks a lot for ArchiveBox! In the documentation, it's stated that "[..] ArchiveBox will never re-download sites that have already succeeded previously."
But what if I wanted to periodically export a website whose content's change are interesting, for example the frontpage of a newspaper website?
Having a way to export the same website several times could provide several snapshots over months or years that could be very interesting.
Describe the ideal specific solution you'd want, and whether it fits into any broader scope of changes
I think an optional argument to the
archivebox addcommand would fit ideally. It could be named--force-addor--add-if-presentor any similar name (I'm bad at naming things). A general configuration settings could also be considered, but I think the optional argument is more fitting.I don't know the underlying changes required specially to the database models, so I can't really estimate the difficulty of my request.
Thanks in advance!
How badly do you want this new feature?
@pirate commented on GitHub (Aug 23, 2020):
Duplicate: https://github.com/pirate/ArchiveBox/issues/179