starred/ArchiveBox

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git synced 2026-04-25 17:16:00 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #168] purge fails with import error #1627

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-01 17:52:17 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:17 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ehainry on GitHub (Mar 10, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/168

Describe the bug

Purge fails with an ImportError. It tries to import parse_json_link_index which fails.

$ ./bin/archivebox-purge
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./bin/archivebox-purge", line 9, in <module>
    from archive import parse_json_link_index
ImportError: cannot import name 'parse_json_link_index'

Originally created by @ehainry on GitHub (Mar 10, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/168 ### Describe the bug Purge fails with an `ImportError`. It tries to import `parse_json_link_index` which fails. ```bash $ ./bin/archivebox-purge Traceback (most recent call last): File "./bin/archivebox-purge", line 9, in <module> from archive import parse_json_link_index ImportError: cannot import name 'parse_json_link_index' ```

kerem

2026-03-01 17:52:17 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
status: wip

size: easy
labels

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:18 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Mortuus-Medicus commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2019):

Would it be possible to have a remove button/checkbox on the index.html, and thus you could remove by selecting them through that, it could then direcly remove the website or it could just mark it for when ./archive goes to write to it again, it sees the mark and moves the website.

@Mortuus-Medicus commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2019): Would it be possible to have a remove button/checkbox on the index.html, and thus you could remove by selecting them through that, it could then direcly remove the website or it could just mark it for when ./archive goes to write to it again, it sees the mark and moves the website.

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:18 +03:00

Author

Owner

@mlazana commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019):

I'll work on it

@mlazana commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019): I'll work on it

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:18 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pirate commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019):

@Mortuus-Medicus yes that will be added once we have the Django UI pushed. For now that's impossible with static HTML as there's no server that's running to listen for the remove request.

The purge script will be updated in v0.3.0, can you wait until that version is released, or do you need to purge URLs immediately?

@pirate commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019): @Mortuus-Medicus yes that will be added once we have the Django UI pushed. For now that's impossible with static HTML as there's no server that's running to listen for the remove request. The purge script will be updated in [v0.3.0](https://github.com/pirate/ArchiveBox/pull/197), can you wait until that version is released, or do you need to purge URLs immediately?

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:18 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Mortuus-Medicus commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019):

@pirate Would it not be possible to achieve the same result with JS? Or is that not robust enough?

@Mortuus-Medicus commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019): @pirate Would it not be possible to achieve the same result with JS? Or is that not robust enough?

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pirate commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019):

What do you mean? Client-side JS cannot access the filesystem (no way to store the marked URLs for removal without filesystem access), and we're not adding a node server just for that one feature when Django is almost finished anyway.

@pirate commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019): What do you mean? Client-side JS cannot access the filesystem (no way to store the marked URLs for removal without filesystem access), and we're not adding a node server just for that one feature when Django is almost finished anyway.

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@Mortuus-Medicus commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019):

I see, then there's no real point in reinventing the wheel if you already have almost finished Django!
(Hmm... Don't know why, but I'm feeling the urge to recreate your program in Go)

@Mortuus-Medicus commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2019): I see, then there's no real point in reinventing the wheel if you already have almost finished Django! (Hmm... Don't know why, but I'm feeling the urge to recreate your program in Go)

kerem commented

2026-03-01 17:52:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@pirate commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2019):

FYI This is fixed here: https://github.com/pirate/ArchiveBox/wiki/Roadmap#-archivebox-remove

There's a posted example of the new behavior there too ^

You can check it out on the django branch, but don't run it on a big existing archive without backing it up somewhere first!

@pirate commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2019): FYI This is fixed here: https://github.com/pirate/ArchiveBox/wiki/Roadmap#-archivebox-remove There's a posted example of the new behavior there too ^ You can check it out on the `django` branch, but don't run it on a big existing archive without backing it up somewhere first!

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-01 18:01:16 +03:00

[PR #1627] Fix typo in timestamp scale factor #2966

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-15 01:46:20 +03:00

[PR #1627] [MERGED] Fix typo in timestamp scale factor #4472

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/ArchiveBox#1627

No description provided.

Rows
Columns