mirror of
https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox.git
synced 2026-04-25 09:06:02 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #76] Page loads produce a GET request to nicksweeting.com, with referrer header #1563
Labels
No labels
expected: maybe someday
expected: next release
expected: release after next
expected: unlikely unless contributed
good first ticket
help wanted
pull-request
scope: all users
scope: windows users
size: easy
size: hard
size: medium
size: medium
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: done
status: idea-phase
status: needs followup
status: wip
status: wontfix
touches: API/CLI/Spec
touches: configuration
touches: data/schema/architecture
touches: dependencies/packaging
touches: docs
touches: js
touches: views/replayers/html/css
why: correctness
why: functionality
why: performance
why: security
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ArchiveBox#1563
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @InconsolableCellist on GitHub (Apr 5, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/issues/76
Open the developer tools in your browser and open the generated index.html page.
Note that it makes a request to nicksweeting.com for /images/archive.png.
The expected behavior would be that this image is stored locally (or not at all), and making an external request could be perceived as using the relatively unimportant graphic as a tracking/analytics image. It provides a central source with the capability to learn how many unique IPs/browsers are using this code, who the referrer is, and the browser fingerprint. The image is cached after being grabbed once.
Though the cellular automata JS on nicksweeting.com is cool, I don't think it's a good idea to make the request to the author's website, and it seems like it's at least possible it's for undisclosed analytics purposes.
@pirate commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2018):
Ah whoops, that was an artifact of me being lazy and not including it in the source. I meant to remove that link in favor of a local file early on but must've forgotten about it. Will fix.
@InconsolableCellist commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2018):
Sweet, thanks!
@pirate commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2018):
Fixed in
f7015d2