[GH-ISSUE #308] [BUG] On boarding not working. #559

Open
opened 2026-03-13 20:56:30 +03:00 by kerem · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @doncat99 on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/AJaySi/ALwrity/issues/308

Originally assigned to: @AJaySi on GitHub.

🐛 Bug Description

A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

🔄 Steps to Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to '...'
  2. Click on '....'
  3. Scroll down to '....'
  4. See error

Expected Behavior

A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Actual Behavior

A clear and concise description of what actually happened.

📸 Screenshots

If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

🖥️ Environment

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. Windows 10, macOS 12.0, Ubuntu 20.04]
  • Browser: [e.g. Chrome 91, Firefox 89, Safari 14]
  • ALwrity Version: [e.g. v1.2.3]

Mobile (please complete the following information):

  • Device: [e.g. iPhone 12, Samsung Galaxy S21]
  • OS: [e.g. iOS 14.6, Android 11]
  • Browser: [e.g. Safari, Chrome Mobile]

📋 Additional Context

Add any other context about the problem here.

🔍 Error Logs

If applicable, paste any error logs or console output here:

Paste error logs here


13:22:43 | ERROR    | services.seo_tools.sitemap_service:analyze_sitemap_for_onboarding:366 - Error in onboarding sitemap analysis: Failed to parse sitemap XML: not well-formed (invalid token): line 18, column 36

13:22:43 | ERROR    | api.onboarding_utils.step3_routes:analyze_sitemap_for_onboarding:429 - Sitemap analysis failed: Failed to parse sitemap XML: not well-formed (invalid token): line 18, column 36

🏷️ Component/Feature

Which component or feature is affected?

  • Blog Writer
  • SEO Dashboard
  • Content Planning
  • Facebook Writer
  • LinkedIn Writer
  • Onboarding
  • Authentication
  • API
  • Other: _______________

🎯 Priority

  • Critical (blocks core functionality)
  • High (major impact on user experience)
  • Medium (minor impact)
  • Low (cosmetic issue)
Image
Originally created by @doncat99 on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/AJaySi/ALwrity/issues/308 Originally assigned to: @AJaySi on GitHub. ## 🐛 Bug Description A clear and concise description of what the bug is. ## 🔄 Steps to Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: 1. Go to '...' 2. Click on '....' 3. Scroll down to '....' 4. See error ## ✅ Expected Behavior A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen. ## ❌ Actual Behavior A clear and concise description of what actually happened. ## 📸 Screenshots If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem. ## 🖥️ Environment **Desktop (please complete the following information):** - OS: [e.g. Windows 10, macOS 12.0, Ubuntu 20.04] - Browser: [e.g. Chrome 91, Firefox 89, Safari 14] - ALwrity Version: [e.g. v1.2.3] **Mobile (please complete the following information):** - Device: [e.g. iPhone 12, Samsung Galaxy S21] - OS: [e.g. iOS 14.6, Android 11] - Browser: [e.g. Safari, Chrome Mobile] ## 📋 Additional Context Add any other context about the problem here. ## 🔍 Error Logs If applicable, paste any error logs or console output here: ``` Paste error logs here 13:22:43 | ERROR | services.seo_tools.sitemap_service:analyze_sitemap_for_onboarding:366 - Error in onboarding sitemap analysis: Failed to parse sitemap XML: not well-formed (invalid token): line 18, column 36 13:22:43 | ERROR | api.onboarding_utils.step3_routes:analyze_sitemap_for_onboarding:429 - Sitemap analysis failed: Failed to parse sitemap XML: not well-formed (invalid token): line 18, column 36 ``` ## 🏷️ Component/Feature Which component or feature is affected? - [ ] Blog Writer - [ ] SEO Dashboard - [ ] Content Planning - [ ] Facebook Writer - [ ] LinkedIn Writer - [ ] Onboarding - [ ] Authentication - [ ] API - [ ] Other: _______________ ## 🎯 Priority - [ ] Critical (blocks core functionality) - [ ] High (major impact on user experience) - [ ] Medium (minor impact) - [ ] Low (cosmetic issue) <img width="2800" height="1356" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c11bd4e4-a499-48c1-8832-c09d5fd03253" />
Author
Owner

@doncat99 commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):

I think the onboarding pipeline is too strict to the results of the steps inside.

I am not only facing to above error, but also below:

Image

i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3441130493 --> @doncat99 commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025): I think the onboarding pipeline is too strict to the results of the steps inside. I am not only facing to above error, but also below: <img width="2806" height="1386" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3aa8c07-7c7b-4c50-84be-1d886e2df60d" /> i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design.
Author
Owner

@AJaySi commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):

@doncat99

Hmmm, there is heuristic to get the sitemap with different combinations.

  • Also, even if sitemap analysis fails, the competitor analysis results should have been presented.
    I will need to do better exception handling.

  • As part of the exception handling, I will also provide an input for manually providing the sitemap, when we fail to get the sitemap.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3441134643 --> @AJaySi commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025): @doncat99 Hmmm, there is heuristic to get the sitemap with different combinations. - Also, even if sitemap analysis fails, the competitor analysis results should have been presented. I will need to do better exception handling. - As part of the exception handling, I will also provide an input for manually providing the sitemap, when we fail to get the sitemap.
Author
Owner

@AJaySi commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):

"i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design."

  • I agree. Can you help make it better ? Thanks.
<!-- gh-comment-id:3441134974 --> @AJaySi commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025): "i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design." - I agree. Can you help make it better ? Thanks.
Author
Owner

@doncat99 commented on GitHub (Oct 28, 2025):

"i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design."

  • I agree. Can you help make it better ? Thanks.

Ummm... business flow and data flow are not designed reasonably. You should first draw your desired business flow and clearly declare it.

In my opinion, the onboarding process should be a summit and result-oriented interaction; there is no need to break it down into multiple steps, since you don't need users to verify the sub-step outcome. Thus a one-step onboard interaction would be a best practice, and you can do the re-generate in the result onboarding result page.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3456088938 --> @doncat99 commented on GitHub (Oct 28, 2025): > "i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design." > > * I agree. Can you help make it better ? Thanks. Ummm... business flow and data flow are not designed reasonably. You should first draw your desired business flow and clearly declare it. In my opinion, the onboarding process should be a summit and result-oriented interaction; there is no need to break it down into multiple steps, since you don't need users to verify the sub-step outcome. Thus a one-step onboard interaction would be a best practice, and you can do the re-generate in the result onboarding result page.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/ALwrity#559
No description provided.