mirror of
https://github.com/AJaySi/ALwrity.git
synced 2026-04-25 00:45:54 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #308] [BUG] On boarding not working. #559
Labels
No labels
AI Content Agents
AI Content Strategy
AI Content planning
AI Marketing Tools
AI SEO
AI personalization
AI writer
ALwrity Copi-lot
Alwrity web search
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Gemini AI
Integration
LLM
OnBoarding
OnBoarding
RAG knowledgebase Memory
bug
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
openai
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/ALwrity#559
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @doncat99 on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/AJaySi/ALwrity/issues/308
Originally assigned to: @AJaySi on GitHub.
🐛 Bug Description
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
🔄 Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
✅ Expected Behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
❌ Actual Behavior
A clear and concise description of what actually happened.
📸 Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
🖥️ Environment
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Mobile (please complete the following information):
📋 Additional Context
Add any other context about the problem here.
🔍 Error Logs
If applicable, paste any error logs or console output here:
🏷️ Component/Feature
Which component or feature is affected?
🎯 Priority
@doncat99 commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):
I think the onboarding pipeline is too strict to the results of the steps inside.
I am not only facing to above error, but also below:
i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design.
@AJaySi commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):
@doncat99
Hmmm, there is heuristic to get the sitemap with different combinations.
Also, even if sitemap analysis fails, the competitor analysis results should have been presented.
I will need to do better exception handling.
As part of the exception handling, I will also provide an input for manually providing the sitemap, when we fail to get the sitemap.
@AJaySi commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2025):
"i just think the onboarding are too complicated. not a good product design."
@doncat99 commented on GitHub (Oct 28, 2025):
Ummm... business flow and data flow are not designed reasonably. You should first draw your desired business flow and clearly declare it.
In my opinion, the onboarding process should be a summit and result-oriented interaction; there is no need to break it down into multiple steps, since you don't need users to verify the sub-step outcome. Thus a one-step onboard interaction would be a best practice, and you can do the re-generate in the result onboarding result page.