starred/1Remote

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote.git synced 2026-04-25 13:36:03 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #883] Multiple file downloads may fail #717

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00 by kerem · 6 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @itagagaki on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/883

Originally assigned to: @itagagaki on GitHub.

When downloading multiple files via FTP, all the files are completed without errors, but some of the contents are actually incomplete.
Downloading one file at a time is fine.

Originally created by @itagagaki on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/883 Originally assigned to: @itagagaki on GitHub. When downloading multiple files via FTP, all the files are completed without errors, but some of the contents are actually incomplete. Downloading one file at a time is fine.

kerem

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
bug

stale
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025):

i assigned this ticket since i currently dont have a ftp server :)

(or maybe we could require users to use WinSCP as the runner for SFTP/FTP, similar to how Kitty is used for SSH. This way, we wouldn't have to maintain the upload and download for FTP. The idea has been on my mind for some time.)

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025): i assigned this ticket since i currently dont have a ftp server :) (or maybe we could require users to use WinSCP as the runner for SFTP/FTP, similar to how Kitty is used for SSH. This way, we wouldn't have to maintain the upload and download for FTP. The idea has been on my mind for some time.)

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@itagagaki commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025):

Okay :-)
Introducing WinSCP is a good idea, but FluentFTP is not a bad either, I think.

@itagagaki commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025): Okay :-) Introducing WinSCP is a good idea, but FluentFTP is not a bad either, I think.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025):

WinSCP is currently just an immature idea. I dont mean that FluentFTP is bad; the main thought for WinSCP is the hope of reducing maintenance workload. For since I no longer use FTP, I haven't had any opportunity to test 1Remote's FTP functionality.

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2025): WinSCP is currently just an immature idea. I dont mean that FluentFTP is bad; the main thought for WinSCP is the hope of reducing maintenance workload. For since I no longer use FTP, I haven't had any opportunity to test 1Remote's FTP functionality.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@itagagaki commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2025):

For some reason (I don't know why) it stopped reproducing. If it reproduces again, I'll investigate at that time.

@itagagaki commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2025): For some reason (I don't know why) it stopped reproducing. If it reproduces again, I'll investigate at that time.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2025):

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2025): This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:59:30 +03:00

Author

Owner

@itagagaki commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2025):

I haven't seen this in a while. It was most likely a server side issue.

@itagagaki commented on GitHub (Apr 22, 2025): I haven't seen this in a while. It was most likely a server side issue.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-28 12:05:12 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #717] 缩放功能无效 #1553

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-01 17:21:07 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #717] 缩放功能无效 #2512

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-13 11:46:45 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #717] 缩放功能无效 #3510