[GH-ISSUE #77] Sidebar with groups and connections

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:36 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Feb 4, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/77

Originally assigned to: @VShawn on GitHub.

First of all, I would like to thank you for this great tool. I've tried it and it works perfectly fine. One feature, that IMHO would enhance the user experience is to add a sidebar with the groups and connections for each group. I understand that by doing this it would mean a change in the design of the GUI, but could it be added as an option in the configuration? Once again the app works really good, the resizing and behavior of the RDP connections are blazing fast (I've tried different connection managers).

Once again, I appreciate all your effort to develop this great tool.

Emmanuel.

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Feb 4, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/77 Originally assigned to: @VShawn on GitHub. First of all, I would like to thank you for this great tool. I've tried it and it works perfectly fine. One feature, that IMHO would enhance the user experience is to add a sidebar with the groups and connections for each group. I understand that by doing this it would mean a change in the design of the GUI, but could it be added as an option in the configuration? Once again the app works really good, the resizing and behavior of the RDP connections are blazing fast (I've tried different connection managers). Once again, I appreciate all your effort to develop this great tool. Emmanuel.

kerem

2026-02-26 11:56:36 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
meta-enhancement

general-ux
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2021):

Hi, thanks for your appreciation 😄, I am glad that you like it.

And sorry for I dont get the purpose and how it looks like of the sidebar.

Can you give more detail and a draft design? it would be of great help to us

BTW, You can draw simply on a screenshot by MSPAINT, or try https://excalidraw.com/

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2021): Hi, thanks for your appreciation 😄, I am glad that you like it. And sorry for I dont get the purpose and how it looks like of the sidebar. Can you give more detail and a draft design? it would be of great help to us BTW, You can draw simply on a screenshot by MSPAINT, or try https://excalidraw.com/

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2021):

to add a sidebar with the groups and connections for each group

@emmathesaint probably wants the same interface as in mRemoteNG. I find this interface problematic and there is nothing wrong with current approach in PRM, especially since it currently doesn't support groups within groups.

Groups could be added as tree in the list view tho, this would look alot like mRemoteNg only better and interface would work if nested groups are added (which is not easy to achieve with current one). This is already proposed as #46.

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2021): > to add a sidebar with the groups and connections for each group @emmathesaint probably wants the same interface as in mRemoteNG. I find this interface problematic and there is nothing wrong with current approach in PRM, especially since it currently doesn't support groups within groups. Groups could be added as tree in the list view tho, this would look alot like mRemoteNg only better and interface would work if nested groups are added (which is not easy to achieve with current one). This is already proposed as #46.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:36 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021):

Thanks @majkinetor and apologize for my late reply. The idea is not to copy ideas from other software products as mRemoteNG or similars. My request is to be able to have nested groups. This will help a lot to organize the list of the connections and most of all when you have many servers and clients from different locations.

I think this will help a lot with the user experience in terms of organization. I understand that some changes are not easy to develop, but in this case I think it really will improve PRemoteM in terms of use.

Once again @VShawn thanks a lot for your effort and great software.

Thanks.

Emmanuel.

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021): Thanks @majkinetor and apologize for my late reply. The idea is not to copy ideas from other software products as mRemoteNG or similars. My request is to be able to have nested groups. This will help a lot to organize the list of the connections and most of all when you have many servers and clients from different locations. ![2021-02-08 11_29_52-PRemoteM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/62189058/107233178-0c5f0f00-6a01-11eb-9c4b-b5bba92226f1.png) I think this will help a lot with the user experience in terms of organization. I understand that some changes are not easy to develop, but in this case I think it really will improve PRemoteM in terms of use. Once again @VShawn thanks a lot for your effort and great software. Thanks. Emmanuel.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021):

ahhh , do you mean the list like this?

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021): ahhh , do you mean the list like this? ![](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10143738/103165931-9c356900-4858-11eb-9e47-1bc5c7d0ee3a.png)

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021):

@VShawn yes, exactly! if it's possible it really would be helpful! Once again, thanks a lot!

Emmanuel.

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021): @VShawn yes, exactly! if it's possible it really would be helpful! Once again, thanks a lot! Emmanuel.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021):

If you go with this @VShawn keep in mind #73 as it may involve setting it on group level.

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021): If you go with this @VShawn keep in mind #73 as it may involve setting it on group level.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021):

thanks a lot @majkinetor and @VShawn ! I really appreciate your help about this request!

Emma.

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2021): thanks a lot @majkinetor and @VShawn ! I really appreciate your help about this request! Emma.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021):

I am not sure if I will go with this, I can not find any WPF listview implement like https://github.com/VShawn/PRemoteM/issues/77#issuecomment-775229158, and it's hard for me to write a new listview control myself. So let‘s put this into limbo before we can find a proper solution.

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021): I am not sure if I will go with this, I can not find any WPF listview implement like https://github.com/VShawn/PRemoteM/issues/77#issuecomment-775229158, and it's hard for me to write a new listview control myself. So let‘s put this into limbo before we can find a proper solution.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021):

I think its probably the best not to introduce new features that depend on libraries before doing #72 as it may turn out that some of those libs may block you.

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021): I think its probably the best not to introduce new features that depend on libraries before doing #72 as it may turn out that some of those libs may block you.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021):

I think its probably the best not to introduce new features that depend on libraries before doing #72 as it may turn out that some of those libs may block you.

totally agree.

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021): > I think its probably the best not to introduce new features that depend on libraries before doing #72 as it may turn out that some of those libs may block you. totally agree.

kerem commented

2026-02-26 11:56:37 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2022):

since group is no longer exists I will close this ticke.

If any new idea on our new Tag system, feel free to open a new ticket.

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2022): since `group` is no longer exists I will close this ticke. If any new idea on our new Tag system, feel free to open a new ticket.

kerem referenced this issue

2026-02-28 12:00:46 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #62] Replace custom kitty build with vendor build #1008

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-01 17:16:23 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #62] Replace custom kitty build with vendor build #1968

kerem referenced this issue

2026-03-13 00:16:18 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #62] Replace custom kitty build with vendor build #2929

Rows
Columns

[GH-ISSUE #77] Sidebar with groups and connections #62