mirror of
https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote.git
synced 2026-04-25 13:36:03 +03:00
[GH-ISSUE #83] Bulk editing all attributes of selected connections #1988
Labels
No labels
area-configuration
area-ct-app
area-ct-rdp
area-ct-remoteapp
area-ct-ssh
area-ct-vnc
area-launcher
area-list
area-tags
area-teamwork
bug
chore
dependencies
general-build/ci
general-performance
general-refactor
general-security
general-supportive
general-ux
meta-documentation
meta-enhancement
meta-enhancement
meta-feature
meta-help-wanted
meta-unknown-error
priority-hi
priority-low
pull-request
question
resolution-duplicate
resolution-invalid
resolution-wontfix
stale
task-put-off
task-still-considering
task-working-in-progress
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/1Remote#1988
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @majkinetor on GitHub (Feb 18, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/83
Originally assigned to: @majkinetor on GitHub.
Idea in nutshell is:
<multiple values>or<unchanged>One decision should be made: if group edit is allowed with multiple protocols or not. I don't think its much of a hassle to implement any of it, but single protocol may be a bit easier.
Some benefits of this approach are:
Screen mockups
From discussion at #34
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Apr 6, 2021):
@VShawn , check out description for how I thought this could work.
@VShawn commented on GitHub (Apr 8, 2021):
For reference, this is the launcher multi-choice scheme I designed last year for clipboard manager demo by ← key.
just... unfortunately, I don’t have time for PRM recently.
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 10, 2021):
WIP
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 10, 2021):
Complete most of the UI changes on list page
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (May 10, 2021):
Nice, looking forward to test that.
Keep in mind that both UI's (panes vs list) should in principle have the same options.
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 11, 2021):
a little bit of progress by huge code re-factoring
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
Done most of the work, The radio button needs to be replaced with combobox in the next step
@majkinetor try it
PRemoteM 0.5.10.3-beta3.zip
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
Works great, didn't find any issues.
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
About missing things:
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
Cancel button doesn't work
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
which cancel button?
↑ I‘ve tested this button several times
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
Cancel that shows on the list when you select multiple items
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 15, 2021):
Yes I forgot that button. 😆
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 17, 2021):
I think we've all done this
Release.zip
@majkinetor commented on GitHub (May 17, 2021):
Cant see that Select 2 items although I see you are editing in bulk. I would make it more visually distinct tho, I would never notice it if I didn't see screenshot. BTW, make it
Number of selected items: <N>as that english is wrong and suffers from 1/many grammar problem.With this major feature done, I would suggest doing #107 next - the bulk connect is awesome but it has 1 big problem - you can't save arbitrary connection lists for bulk connection since connection can have only one group, and you also probably want to group connection based on something else then bulk connecting.
Example: I have 2 database servers on a project along with N other connections. Group name is the name of the project, but I want to connect to db servers only, not anything else. Currently I have to always select db connections then bulk connect. With tags, I could create arbitrary connection lists and bulk connect to them with appropriate UI in single step.
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021):
got it
sure I came here from #107, but I‘m still hesitating whether to add a tag system.
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021):
this should be conspicuous enough
@VShawn commented on GitHub (May 20, 2021):
0.5.10.3 beta.zip