starred/1Remote

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote.git synced 2026-04-25 21:46:00 +03:00

[GH-ISSUE #206] Allow multiple instances under different users #1138

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00 by kerem · 7 comments

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Owner

Originally created by @alishchytovych on GitHub (Feb 21, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/206

Originally assigned to: @VShawn on GitHub.

Hello,

I can't run the app under multiple users on the same server. Is it possible to make the check on the per user?

github.com/VShawn/PRemoteM@c1be080afb/PRemoteM/App.xaml.cs (L215)

Originally created by @alishchytovych on GitHub (Feb 21, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote/issues/206 Originally assigned to: @VShawn on GitHub. Hello, I can't run the app under multiple users on the same server. Is it possible to make the check on the per user? https://github.com/VShawn/PRemoteM/blob/c1be080afbe451c23b53a2d059be6cf79ea272e8/PRemoteM/App.xaml.cs#L215

kerem

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

closed this issue
added the
bug

general-ux
labels

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@alishchytovych commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2022):

Maybe this approach works for you:

static class Program {
	public static Mutex Single;
	public static string AppId = "966b1f20-1a74-1234-af60-7072a1d55678";

	static void Main(string[] args) {
		if (Mutex.TryOpenExisting(Program.AppId, out Single))
			return;
		try {
			Single = new(false, Program.AppId);
			... run ...
		} finally {
			Single.Close();
		}
	}
}

@alishchytovych commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2022): Maybe this approach works for you: ``` static class Program { public static Mutex Single; public static string AppId = "966b1f20-1a74-1234-af60-7072a1d55678"; static void Main(string[] args) { if (Mutex.TryOpenExisting(Program.AppId, out Single)) return; try { Single = new(false, Program.AppId); ... run ... } finally { Single.Close(); } } } ```

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2022):

Ahhh. I didn't consider multi-user situation, you reminded me.
I will find out how to make it work latter.

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2022): Ahhh. I didn't consider multi-user situation, you reminded me. I will find out how to make it work latter.

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2022):

There is a problem here. In portable app, If the two users edit data at same time , the db of the APP may crash.

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2022): There is a problem here. In portable app, If the two users edit data at same time , the db of the APP may crash.

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2022):

There could be a setting where to keep db - program dir or user dir. Even with portable app, this setting could by default target User directory. PRM could also accept db via cmd line while at it.

@majkinetor commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2022): There could be a setting where to keep db - program dir or user dir. Even with portable app, this setting could by default target User directory. PRM could also accept db via cmd line while at it.

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 23, 2022):

it works, I just leave that conflict risk alone : )

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 23, 2022): ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10143738/155288222-162d2d29-204c-43e3-b6c5-e2256cb1fad7.png) it works, I just leave that conflict risk alone : )

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 23, 2022):

@alishchytovych you can try this beta version.
0.6.2beta.zip

@VShawn commented on GitHub (Feb 23, 2022): @alishchytovych you can try this beta version. [0.6.2beta.zip](https://github.com/VShawn/PRemoteM/files/8123253/0.6.2beta.zip)

kerem commented

2026-02-28 12:02:19 +03:00

Author

Owner

@alishchytovych commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2022):

It works, thank you

@alishchytovych commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2022): It works, thank you

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/1Remote#1138

No description provided.

Rows
Columns